A geographical indication marks out a good — Darjeeling Tea, Kanchipuram Silk, Basmati Rice — as coming from a specific place, where a quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially owed to that origin. Registered under the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration & Protection) Act, 1999, it protects an entire producing community rather than a single owner. Biswajit Sarkar represents producer associations and authorised users through that full process.
A geographical indication is collective by nature — it belongs to everyone producing the good in that region, not to one company. Section 11 of the Act reflects that: only an association of persons, producers, or an organisation or authority representing producers' interests can apply, not an individual producer alone.
Section 2(1)(e) defines it as an indication identifying goods as originating in a region, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic is essentially attributable to that geographical origin — agricultural produce, natural goods, manufactured goods and foodstuffs can all qualify.
The Register of Geographical Indications, maintained by the GI Registry in Chennai, can be checked by name or class to see whether the term is already registered or pending, and who its authorised users are.
Registering the GI itself and registering as an authorised user are two separate steps under Section 17 — only an authorised user, once entered on the Register, is entitled to use the GI on their goods.
Section 9 bars registration of terms that are generic, deceptive, or contrary to law or morality. Once a term clears that bar, registration runs through six stages, each requiring more supporting evidence than a typical trademark filing.
Filed under Section 11 by the producer association, along with a statement of how the good's quality or reputation is tied to the region, a map of the geographical area, and particulars of the producers it covers.
An examiner reviews the application against Section 9's grounds for refusal and the supporting evidence of the good's link to its origin, issuing an examination report that the applicant must respond to within the prescribed period.
If objections in the examination report aren't resolved on paper, the applicant can request a hearing before the Registrar to argue the case directly.
An accepted application is published in the Geographical Indications Journal, opening a three-month window — extendable by a further month on request — during which any person may oppose it.
If no opposition is filed, or one is filed and decided in the applicant's favour, the application proceeds to registration.
The GI is entered in Part A of the Register and a Certificate of Registration issued. Producers can then apply separately, under Section 17, to be entered in Part B as authorised users.
As with trademarks, a GI can be challenged before it registers and after — the grounds and the forum differ depending on which stage the challenge is raised at.
Filed on Form GI-5 within three months of the application's advertisement in the GI Journal, extendable by one further month on request. Common grounds include the term being generic, deceptively similar to an existing GI or trademark, or the application falling foul of Section 9 or Section 10's requirements.
Filed by an aggrieved person before the Registrar or the relevant High Court, following the transfer of the erstwhile Appellate Board's functions under the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, seeking to remove or correct an entry made without sufficient cause, wrongly remaining on the Register, or no longer reflecting the good's link to its region.
A GI registration runs for ten years from the date of registration, much like a trademark, and can be renewed indefinitely — but the registration of an authorised user needs to be kept current separately.
Filed on Form GI-7 ahead of expiry, renewing the GI entry in Part A of the Register for a further ten years, with no cap on the number of renewals.
A renewal filed after expiry can still be accepted within a grace period against a surcharge, keeping the registration's protection continuous.
A GI removed for non-renewal can still be restored on showing sufficient cause and paying the additional prescribed fee, within the period allowed under the Rules.
Each authorised user's own registration under Part B needs to be renewed and, as producers join or leave the association, the list should be kept up to date so enforcement isn't complicated later.
Section 22 covers more than simple counterfeiting — a use that misleads the public about a good's true origin can infringe even where it's dressed up with a qualifier like "style" or "type".
Using a registered GI on goods that don't originate from the specified region, or using it in a way that suggests a false geographical origin to the public, or that amounts to unfair competition against genuine producers.
Using the GI on comparable goods from elsewhere even where the true origin is separately indicated, or where the GI is used alongside words like "kind", "style", "type" or "imitation" — the qualifier doesn't cure the confusion the Act is aimed at.
GIs don't have a single filing route the way patents have the PCT or trademarks have the Madrid Protocol. India isn't party to the Lisbon Agreement's Geneva Act, the treaty that offers that kind of unified registration, so protection abroad is built country by country.
Articles 22 to 24 of the WTO's TRIPS Agreement require every member country to offer some legal means of preventing GI misuse, with an additional, stricter layer of protection reserved for wines and spirits.
Because India hasn't joined the Lisbon Agreement or its 2015 Geneva Act, an Indian GI holder can't get protection across multiple countries through one WIPO filing the way a Madrid trademark application can.
Where a jurisdiction has its own GI regime — the EU's PDO/PGI system, for instance — protection is sought by filing directly with that country's or region's designated authority, under its own procedure and evidentiary standards.
Individual Indian GIs — Darjeeling Tea's recognition in the EU is a well-known example — have secured protection abroad through bilateral negotiation or as part of free trade agreement talks, rather than through a single treaty mechanism.
India extends registration under the Act to GIs originating in WTO member countries and other notified countries on a reciprocal basis, following the same registration process as an Indian GI.
India's possible accession to the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement remains under policy discussion — joining it would let Indian GI holders seek recognition across all its member states through a single filing.
Send us your queries and we'll get back to you.
Let's Talk